Intimidation, Apprehension and Optimism as Mumbai Inhabitants Await the Bulldozers
Over an extended period, threatening messages continued. At first, allegedly from a retired cop and a retired army general, and then from law enforcement directly. In the end, a local artisan states he was called to the local precinct and warned explicitly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.
Shaikh is one of many opposing a multimillion-dollar initiative where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – faces razed and transformed by a multinational conglomerate.
"The distinctive community of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the planet," explains the resident. "Yet their intention is to dismantle our social fabric and silence our voices."
Contrasting Realities
The cramped lanes of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and elite residences that dominate the area. Homes are constructed informally and often without proper sanitation, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the air is permeated by the suffocating smell of uncovered waste channels.
For certain residents, the prospect of a renewed Dharavi into a glistening neighborhood of luxury high-rises, organized recreational areas, shiny shopping centers and apartments with two toilets is an optimistic future come true.
"We lack adequate medical facilities, proper streets or sewage systems and there's nowhere for youth to recreate," says a chai seller, fifty-six, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and provide modern residences."
Local Protest
However, some, including Shaikh, are opposing the redevelopment.
Everyone acknowledges that the slum, historically ignored as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring investment and development. However they fear that this project – lacking public consultation – could potentially transform valuable urban land into a playground for the rich, displacing the disadvantaged, working-class residents who have been there since the late 1800s.
This involved these shunned, relocated individuals who established the empty marshland into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and commercial output, whose economic value is estimated at between $1m and a substantial sum per year, making it one of the world's largest informal economies.
Resettlement Issues
Among approximately a million inhabitants living in the dense sprawling zone, fewer than half will be able for new homes in the project, which is estimated to take seven years to accomplish. Additional residents will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the distant periphery of Mumbai, threatening to fragment a generations-old community. A portion will not get housing at all.
People eligible to remain in Dharavi will be allocated apartments in tower blocks, a significant rupture from the natural, shared lifestyle of living and working that has sustained the community for so long.
Businesses from garment work to pottery and recycling are projected to shrink in number and be relocated to a designated "industrial sector" separated from homes.
Livelihood Crisis
For those such as this protester, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to reside in the slum, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, multi-level operation produces apparel – formal jackets, suede trenches, decorated jackets – distributed in high-end shops in south Mumbai and internationally.
Household members resides in the spaces below and employees and tailors – laborers from different regions – live on-site, allowing him to sustain operations. Away from Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are typically significantly costlier for a single room.
Threats and Warning
In the administrative buildings close by, an illustrated mock-up of the transformation initiative depicts an alternative outlook. Fashionable people gather on bicycles and eco-friendly transport, purchasing continental baked goods and breakfast items and socializing on an outdoor area adjacent to a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This represents a world away from the affordable idli sambar breakfast and low-cost tea that supports local residents.
"This represents no development for us," states the protester. "It's a massive land development that will price people out for residents to remain."
There is also skepticism of the development company. Headed by an influential industrialist – one of India's most powerful and a supporter of the national leader – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it rejects.
While local authorities calls it a collaborative effort, the business group contributed nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A lawsuit alleging that the initiative was improperly granted to the corporation is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.
Continued Intimidation
From when they initiated to vocally oppose the redevelopment, Shaikh and other residents assert they have been faced a long-running campaign of harassment and intimidation – comprising messages, direct threats and suggestions that opposing the initiative was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by individuals they allege work for the developer.
Part of the group accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c